McIntosh vs. Marantz ...... sonics?


I have a few 22xx Marantz receivers (2226b and 2250b) which I really enjoy. They sound sweet.
I have heard so many good things about McIntosh that I am intruiged, and maybe interested in trying a Mac. I am thinking of an int-amp or receiver.

Would I really hear an improvement or is it mostly reputation?
I am considering trying it but Mac gear is so much pricier than what I have.

Thanks,
Rob
albireo13
McIntosh would be the next setp in all diminsions of sonic quality. You will receive a lot of advice against McIntosh but if you have an interest in McIntosh as I have had for years you will love it more than Marantz. Gleen out the anti-Mc comments and go for it.
My Mac 1700 was a huge leap above my Marantz 2216. Both were mint, the mac phono stage is far superior. The Marantz tuner sections are really nice.
If you can swing it. go with the Mc. The McIintosh MA 6600, I have found to be amazing.