Krell FPB 600

I hate to take over but since your question was answered and the title subject is up my alley........
DOES THE FPB 600(non ""C"")MAKE A STEP FORWARD COMPARED TO THE KSA 250???
I had the 250 long enough to know I appreciate Krell's sound(can be a little crisp at times,but I have been spoiled by the bass) and the SPL!!!!!I have read some older comparisions but looking for more current ones?
I currently use a Krell HTS 7.1 and SACD Standard and Raysonic CD 128 with BIG ATC sounding DIY speakers.
thanks

I went from the KSA 250 that was upgraded to 250S. I like the unlimited power and smoother over all sound of the 600. I sold mine and purchased the 350 monos and liked the 600 better. So I returned the 350's to Krell and got a 600C which I later had upgraded to 700CX. I still have it.

thanks Rwwear
did you find a ""BIG"" difference between the orig.FPB and the ""C"" and ""CX""?? Also did you find the heat factor similar to the KSA(I found it very hot for a 250w amp)?How did you find the mid/hi in comparison to the KSA and FPB(non C)?
thanks again

I didn't hear much if any difference between the C and CX there's just more power. The heat factor is about the same, it never bothered me. I found the 600 to be smoother overall in the treble and midrange with a larger soundstage but it's been a long time since I compared them.