EAR 868 vs VTL 5.5 II


Hi there ! i am inclined to purchase the ear 868 preamp w phonostage at $7k which i tried w my set up and i am just wandering if anyone have compared the VTL 5.5 II w phonostage against ear 868 w phono.

Any comments & suggestions are greatly appreciated.

My Set up are

Turntable : Michell ORBE/SME V arm / Ortofon Cadenza Black
Speaker : Anthony Gallo 3.1
Pre Amp : VTL 5.5 series 1 w/out phono - im using DIY
phono preamp ( fair enough but not very good )
Amp : Musical Fidelity 550k supercharger as main amp
Wires : Acoustic Zen Satori - spkr cables
Acoustic Zen Krakatoa - Power chords
XLO Signature - Interconnect
Van Del Hul - SME V built in Tonearm Cable

Thanks.
sgm
I've heard the 868 with phono. What it gives you is involvement, clear presentation of the artist and good tonal balance. Surprisingly for a tube, it has a fast transient and good dynamics. The it's a transformer coupled circuit. The phono section is very flexible using 4, 6, 40 ohms loading that will mate with various cartridges.
Thanks for your comment Analog_soul.

I agree with your observation with ear 868 and it also
has texture of live performance sound than my previous VTL 5.5 series 1 but with outboard phonostage.

I havent compared it with VTL 5.5 II w phono for closer comparison.
To : Analog_soul

I sincerely ask your comments on my listed audio gears above to which is the weakest link or the item i should upgrade first after the ear 868.

The Gallo 3.1 speaker sounds great with those gear however i am craving for more warm presentation and dynamics for a more involving listening.

Thanks Again.
In my experience, in my system (via Pass Labs XA30.5 power amp), the Shindo Aurieges is superior to both these preamps for less money.