Rowland 625

Thank you Isvaldo for encouraging people to use their own ears. Unfortunately I have never heard M312 and M625 in the same system. Therefore, at this time, I do not know what I prefer between the two, nor I have any real idea if they sound the same, or different.

My pleasure.

Isvaldo

OK to finally put an end to this she loves me, she loves me not. If you hear both a 625 and a 312 in the same system you will know within 2 seconds that the 625 is way way better. It's not a little better Brazcole. It's a lot better. The bass is better. the treble is better. I can go on and on, but the fact is you can barely listen to the 312 after hearing the 625. It has a super magical spooky great sound quality to it. I have 600-800 hrs on mine and it still takes my breath away every time i listen to it. 300 watts is NOT a low powered amp. Look at the 4 ohm spec. It nearly doubles into 4 ohms. Very few amps in the world can do that, and it tells you a lot about the current capability of that amp also. It, along with the yet to be released 925 mono amps, are going to rock this world of audiophile amp technology and sound. The boys of at Jeff's camp know this, and are very patiently finishing the 925. Until you have heard the 625 you just don't understand that it isn't hype you are reading from those of us that have. Aloha, David.

I will have the opportunity to compare both side by side next month ...

looking forward ;-)

Guido, Any 925 news?