Anyone HEARD the qol 'signal completion' device?

Ozzy, At least one user did not like it enough to keep it. Read Madfloyd's comments above. He writes "Ultimately I found....the effect too distracting for me." I spoke to him at length about it. He returned it after the trial period and I had the impression that some others have also. Maybe I just read that somewhere else. I'm glad you like yours.

I did ask some specific questions of you in my post dated 2/4/12 above. Could you please elaborate? I once owned Eggleston speakers and got them to disappear quite nicely. How do you know the improved sound you are getting is from the Qol unit and not all the changes you made with your set up? Have you toggled it in and out of your system like Madfloyd did to hear the difference. I'm just curios, thanks.

On 2/1 I posted a question. Does anybody have an opinion?

Peterayer,
Well, the price tag could cause Buyers remorse. Its hard to believe that anyone would not approve of the sound quality though. But, to each his own.

I have tried the Qol unit every which way. Moving around my Andra's was to grab all the soundstage that the Qol would provide.

Onhwy61, I reread your question and I am sorry, I just don't know how to answer it.

Ait, I believe I have read that the unit is sealed. But I dont how. There are screws that look like they are holding the cover on. I may try to take it off someday when I have some time.

Ozzy, It had nothing to do with price.

When you toggle the unit in and out of the signal path, what do you hear other than a change in volume? Does the soundstage collapse? Is part of the signal missing?

I will reiterate that I found the unit to 'add' to the signal in a very unnatural way. Increasing the amount of reverb on a singer's voice or lead instrument is not true fidelity in my opinion.

I'm surprised that so many actually like it.