Looks like you are getting a range of good advice/opinions. I have enjoyed my Thiel CS 2's since 1987. I don't know how they compare to CS 3.5's, but I agree with Stringreen. You are hearing the Thiel sound. I auditioned Vandersteens some years ago. The sound was quite different from my Thiels. The 'steens' sound was
"sweet," seemed to be restrained, attenuated across the range, almost a bit muffled. I have read and agree that Thiels tend to be quite revealing. Yes they are. Mine are driven by a 1995 Hafler 9180 MOSFET amp and I am very happy with what I hear. I wonder about a MOSFET amp for you like the B and K 200.2. Used equipment I yield to the more experienced members. Thiels can create a very impressive sound stage with proper placement and room dampening. I have read their sound reproduction qualities vary widely with room placement. Have you considered some sound dampening? Good Luck!
"sweet," seemed to be restrained, attenuated across the range, almost a bit muffled. I have read and agree that Thiels tend to be quite revealing. Yes they are. Mine are driven by a 1995 Hafler 9180 MOSFET amp and I am very happy with what I hear. I wonder about a MOSFET amp for you like the B and K 200.2. Used equipment I yield to the more experienced members. Thiels can create a very impressive sound stage with proper placement and room dampening. I have read their sound reproduction qualities vary widely with room placement. Have you considered some sound dampening? Good Luck!