Class A to XX Watts


I've only used pure Class A (Aleph J), never an amp that started out in Class A for the first few watts only. Wouldn't the transition out of Class A be audible? Seems to me that if it is then that would be a bad thing. If it isn't audible, then why would anyone design it that way to begin with (marketing?)?
ddd1
Post removed 
Good 'compromise' and one heck of an amp would be the Pass 'a' series.
The XA30.5 is fully 30x2 in 'a'. BUT it redlines at around 3x that+ when firmly in A/B.
Unless you are a panel user.....like Elizabeth, me and many others, this is a decent amount of power. I suspect the XA60.5 would be the last amp I would ever need....and never leave 'a'.

Tough to beat a hi-headroom 'a' amp.
Just how noticeable the transition from Class A to Class B depends on different conditions. Often times the transition will happen as either bass demands and/or overall volume increases. During such times ones ears might not be as sensitive to the change from Class A to Class B. Usually the longer an amp can maintain Class A operation, the longer the amp can offer it's contribution to better sound, but the longer an amp can maintain Class A, the more expensive and less efficient the amp becomes. Better to to switch to Class B than to run out of Class A Watts, and run into distortion and clipping. High biased Class AB amps can be an appropriate combination of sound quality, efficiency and economy.
Unsound, that sounds very sound, and one of the benefits go higher efficiency speakers
Pubul57, unto itself that might appear to be the case, but speakers are another issue unto themselves. The net result of the interaction between them is not necessarily as it might so appear. Speakers that are less efficient aren't so for the sake of it, but for advantages elsewhere.