rega P5 with dynavector 10x5..which phono?

Big fan of the P75. Worked great with MM carts before I moved to a LOMC that could use the PE mode. And there may be Dyna synergy. Haven't tried the GCPH, but in my system preferred P75 to Vincent PHO-8 and Quicksilver tubed phono pre.

thank you both Sounds_real_audio and Roscoeiii

I have a P3-24 with the same cartridge... Thiel 2.4s and a Pass Labs INT-30A, and have tried three different phonos. One was the Phono board in my Classe-CAP151 integrated (used just as a pre-amp), the second was the PS audio GCPH, and the third (now owned) is the Jasmine LP2.0 Mk II. The PS audio was the worst, it presented no images, pretty much just throwing instruments into the two channels. I guess instrument clarity and tone was pretty good, just a terrible, terrible soundstage. The Classe was second best, it presented a real recessed image (the worst exemplar, Stevie Wonder's Music of My Mind, sounded like a floating ball of sound that was about 2 square yards right in the center between my speakers) but presented a lot of information about depth of instruments within the soundstage. The Jasmine sounded much better than either out of the box (I'm just about 30 hours in)... nice detailed images that stretch across the soundstage. The soundstage is the same size as that produced by my PS Audio Perfect Wave DAC, and the analog end of my system actually made Simon's Graceland sound better than the digital version. That wasn't as true with some other recordings (there was added detail in the digital version of Stevie Wonder's Song's in the Key of Life, for instance). In any case, at the ~$500 price range I feel like Jasmine is a winner. I have the expectation that it will allow me to hear any future upgrades in the analog signal path. I certainly know whenever a significant dust hair is dragging along the dynavector.

@ Cal3713
thank you very much
can you describe how the Jasmine sound?
is fast or more warm?the bass is tight or more soft?

sorry for bad english

To be honest, I primarily listen to imaging, and am not sure I've heard enough other phono's to make good comparisons on those dimensions. In comparing to my digital, I certainly think the sound is well balanced, the highs are softer and bit less detailed than the digital (but I guess that's normal and to be expected), and the bass is significantly better. Unfortunately, my current amp doesn't have the best bass control over the Thiels (see my other threads), so I'm not sure I'm in a good position to comment on the tight/soft dimension. Perhaps tonight I'll listen and see if I think I can make further comment along the dimensions you're most interested.