Tube pre, SS amp incompatibility, which amp 2 use?


I wanted to see how a tubed pre-amp would sound in my system so I purchased a Jolida Music Envoy pre-amp to mate with my McCormack DNA-1 amplifier. When I put the pre-amp in the system it would not work. After talking to Jolida, where Jerred helped me try various things, we came to the conclusion that they were just not compatible, since the Jolida works just fine with an old Marantz I have. The Jolida has in output impedance of 600 ohms. The McCormack has an input impedance of 100K ohms.

Next I emailed Steve McCormack asking his opinion, and he also gave various reasons for the failure, but after letting him know what was done in an attempt at making them work together, he also stated it may just be a compatibility issue.

Now I would like to get a different amp to try with the Jolida, but am a little weary of purchasing another just to find out that for one reason or another it will not work.

Since this is just to see if I would like what I hear, I don't want to put a lot of money into it. My speakers are 6 ohm Gershman Acoustics Sonograms and are 89db efficient, so I'm looking at an SS amp with good power for less than $1K.
Does anyone know of any amps I can look into that DO work with the Jolida, knowing for sure, that they will be compatible?
128x128abucktwoeighty
Abucktwoeighty There may be other ways to sort this out too. How are your power cords set up? Are they both running off of the same power strip?
Yes, the pre-amp and the amp are plugged into a Monster HTS5000 Power Center. I found there is less noise when I have the amp plugged into it instead of directly into an outlet.
Unsound, note my earlier statement:
Basically, the very high input impedance of the DNA-1 may be bringing out a design issue in the preamp. The Marantz presumably has a much lower input impedance, perhaps 47K or less, which does not bring out the issue. The very extended low frequency bandwidth of the DNA-1 (specified as 0.5 Hz) is presumably also a factor that contributes to bringing out the issue, as explained in Ralph's (Atmasphere's) posts.
The problem is with the Jolida, but if there are means by which the Jolida and the DNA-1 can be made work together, and which produce results that 280 finds to be sonically satisfactory, there is no need to replace it.

Best regards,
-- Al
Thanks Al. I can't explain why I missed that in very first sentence. Silly me.