Salectric, I would pose to you the question I posed to Wolf:
Do you really want to risk applying upwards of 60 volts to the inputs or outputs of components like these, at least some of which cost well over $10K, even for a fraction of a second? Inputs and outputs that are designed to generate or receive voltages that are around 2 volts or less? If so, be my guest. I would encourage others not to do so, even if the approach I suggested compromises the resolution of the comparison that will be made.
I am NOT saying that damage WILL occur as a result of the approach that you and Wolf are espousing. Most likely it will not. But I am saying that it creates a risk, especially given that RCA's are involved, and that it is therefore a very poor practice that should not be encouraged.
Regards,
-- Al
Have you ever connected the probe of an oscilloscope to a low or zero voltage circuit point on a piece of equipment, without connecting its ground lead, and looked at the voltage waveform that is displayed on the scope under that condition?I assume that your answer, and his, would be "no." I have done that. Depending on the grounding configuration of the particular equipment, a 60 Hz sine wave measuring well upwards of 60 volts will sometimes be seen in that situation. And depending on the grounding configuration of the components in the audio system, a similarly huge sine wave might end up being applied to the inputs and/or outputs of all of the audio components that are involved in the interconnect swaps (including the source component), during the fraction of a second or so that the RCA plugs are being inserted or removed, due to the absence of a ground connection during that fraction of a second.
Do you really want to risk applying upwards of 60 volts to the inputs or outputs of components like these, at least some of which cost well over $10K, even for a fraction of a second? Inputs and outputs that are designed to generate or receive voltages that are around 2 volts or less? If so, be my guest. I would encourage others not to do so, even if the approach I suggested compromises the resolution of the comparison that will be made.
I am NOT saying that damage WILL occur as a result of the approach that you and Wolf are espousing. Most likely it will not. But I am saying that it creates a risk, especially given that RCA's are involved, and that it is therefore a very poor practice that should not be encouraged.
Regards,
-- Al