Is soundstage just a distortion?


Years back when I bought a Shure V15 Type 3 and then later when I bought a V15 Type 5 Shure would send you their test records (still have mine). I also found the easiest test to be the channel phasing test. In phase yielded a solid center image but one channel out of phase yielded a mess, but usually decidedly way off center image.

This got me thinking of the difference between analog and digital. At its best (in my home) I am able to get a wider soundstage out of analog as compared to digital. Which got me thinking- is a wide soundstage, one that extends beyond speakers, just an artifact of phase distortion (and phase distortion is something that phono cartridges can be prone to)? If this is the case, well, it can be a pleasing distortion.
128x128zavato
Looking forward to receiving mine:) And the others too!

Thanks, Rodman.

BTW, I was going to word it a little differently, Al;) You certainly didn't take the words out of my mouth.
Al's comments are on point. Goeff's reference to the Opus 3 recordings, especially 'Depth of Image' makes me wonder though what would have happened if I had never heard that record over a system which had its soundstage capabilities optimized. I used this disc for years as a goal/reference when trying to establish my own system. But, if you had never heard its capabilities in the first place it wouldn't mean so much - it still sounds great and you might not know what opportunities for improvement exist.
Hi all.

Just read this entire thread. I have to say that Mezmo's post had many good points and was well articulated - very good post Mezmo! Actually, I found many good posts in this thread. It's been a good read and very interesting.

However, when Mezmo stated: "They bounce off of stuff, stuff can get in the way, the room can resonate at weird frequencies, they can bounce into each other and either cancel each other out or get excited in strange and inappropriate ways, in short, they can get into all manner of trouble." I know he was referring to sound waves, but it sure did remind me of my buddies and I attending our first junior high school mixer.

Sorry to interrupt. Intermission is now over.

Please carry on,

Tim

Soundstage is a form of trickery,but can be fun when you hear it after changing a component.

Was it always there?
Or is it some sort of benevolent distortion that the new component has?

Perhaps the new component is more revealing of what had always been there in the recording?

Is the recording an accurate reproduction of a real musical event or is the soundstage just studio trickery?

Perhaps we need a list of recordings that are known to throw a huge soundtage in either or both formats.

But if a speaker didn't throw a huge soundstage,is that a deal breaker?
Maybe it does other things better,maybe it's more truthful to the tone of the instruments, or has more depth, detail or speed.

I suppose I should admit that I don't fuss about soundstage as much as I used to and that I don't miss it.

I do fuss about other things.

If I can't differentiate a string bass from a Fender,I wouldn't care about good or bad soundstage.

I remember some of my systems had better soundstaging than what I have now, but those systems were mostly of the 2 driver stand mount variety.

To go back to those systems just for improved soundstaging would be too much of a sacrifice in other aspects of sound reproduction for my tatse.
The verdict is in. I just listened to Roger Waters' Amused To Death. I must say I'm definitely not amused. Sound engineers definitely 'are' magicians! I'm hearing point source information as far to the left and right of my speakers as they are apart. Truly amazing.