2. amps-preamps
  3. 1373695261

Cambridge Topaz AM10 vs Yamaha AS300 vs Onkyo

Cambridge Audio TopazAM10 vs Yamaha AS300 vs Onkyo A9050?

Setup: Denon turntable, Denon MC (but high output) cartridge, Wharfedale speakers

This is as far as my budget will stretch, and I'm planning on buying new from Crutchfield. I don't have a separate phono preamp, but all of these have a built in one. They're all around the same price as well, although the Onkyo is 50$ more ($350). Which one would be the best option?

I listen to punk, indie, lo-fi, some folk, and ska. All from past 20 years or so.

Thank you.
toxicwaterfront
tls49's avatar
tls49
1,351 posts
 
I like Zd542's recommendation for the Cambridge phono stage. Should be much better than those that are built in. Why not just use it with your current amp?
toxicwaterfront OP
41 posts
 
My current amp is a NADC315BEE, but unfortunately the (non-detachable) power cord doesn't work anymore!
schubert
7,386 posts
 
I agree with Kotta,Yamaha quality is better and they have always had decent phono stages.
tonyangel
309 posts
 
In my experience, NAD equipment is typically under rated and perform beyond their rating. NAD phono sections are usually pretty good, for built in (from what I understand).

Have you given any thought to just having the power cord replaced?

I think that any of the ones that you mentioned would be a step backwards in sound quality. If you just have the urge to spend money, I'd suggest checking out the classifieds and getting into a used NAD. Lots of bang for the buck there.
zd542
5,339 posts
 
"07-15-13: Toxicwaterfront
My current amp is a NADC315BEE, but unfortunately the (non-detachable) power cord doesn't work anymore!"

You can probably fix that yourself. Open it up and have a look.
More to discover