What's the sonic advantage of bi-wiring


Hello, I'm running a pair of bi-wireable King electrostatic speakers with a pair of VAC monoblocks. I'm using a borrowed pair of Kimber Monocle XL cables with Audience AU24e jumpers. Can anyone give me an idea of what kind of sonic differences I would hear by using bi-wired speaker cables. I'm thinking about using Audience AU24e cables. Any insight would be helpful.
bwos
Generally speaking, you can expect a cleaner sound overall with better separation between instruments. A little better imaging also. The real issue with bi-wiring is, is it worth doing? That all depends on your equipment. Most people will tell you to get a single run of a really good cable with jumpers, instead of 2 lesser runs. I feel that is the way to go most of the time. There are some exceptions, however. In my main system, I use Vandersteen speakers. They design their speakers to be bi-wired. It makes a very big difference. In my system, 2 inexpensive runs of cable sound much better that 1 really expensive pair. In my 2nd system, I have a pair of Wilson speakers. They don't believe in bi-wiring. They only put 1 set of binding posts on the speakers and don't even allow for it.

In the end, every system is different and you just have to try it. Theres really no other way. I had a pair of Martin Logan ESL's and I preferred 1 run of cable with jumpers with those speakers.
I prefer a single wire with jumpers to biwiring. I agree it really depends on the speaker and how the crossover is designed.

I have owned many, many, many speakers and outside of the Vandys, I always preferred the method above.
It's not always better. I don't know if it is my speakers, my amps, or the speaker/amp interface, but, my system sounds better not bi wired. It is better though using a double run of the same cables.