Housewives of Audiogon
Question on FR 66s
For some reason, search on FR 66s in agon did not turn up anything much. I recalled that recommended S2P distance is 296mm rather than 295mm and Stevenson geometry seems to work best. Is this correct? I already have FR 64s which works very nicely with Koetsu. In general, does FR 66s works well with the more modern cartridges, Lyra, Air Tight, Dynavector etc.
I am kind of curious to try it but not sure what to try it with. Beside those mentioned on my system page, I have Kiseki Blue, XV-1s and Miyajima Zero on hand currently.
Thanks for any suggestion.
I am kind of curious to try it but not sure what to try it with. Beside those mentioned on my system page, I have Kiseki Blue, XV-1s and Miyajima Zero on hand currently.
Thanks for any suggestion.
- ...
- 212 posts total
Dear Halcro: ++++ " The real point of all this is that Raul selected the Stevenson alignment (which he doesn't use himself)........to prove that my 233mm P to S distance is 0.3mm out? Instead of having to concur that I have the tonearm set up correctly for interchangeability of headshells (according to Baerwald)........he will grasp at the ridiculous to avoid admitting defeat? " +++++ wrong again, a misunderstood. I don't took Stevenson ( FR took it. ) to prove that you are out for 0.3mm because as you admit you has an overhang of 12mm ( to match the 66. ): you showed in the calculator link you posted!! ++++ " instead of having to concur that I have the tonearm set up correctly for interchangeability of headshells (according to Baerwald). " +++++ wrong again, Baerwald ( IEC/DIN ) does not shows 12mm on overhang with 233 on StP distance. Where do you read it? Btw, in no one of the posts that gentleman could prove any of his theories, I have the posts. Now, don't talk prove what you post. Bla, bla, bla,.. means nothing: where are those facts that are the foundation of your posts? In the other side the discussion is between you and me: why brought here the name of a third or fourth person trying to convince ( your self because you can't convince any one else. ) or prove what you can't do it because your whole subject misunderstood? or only are trying to distract from the main subject: your misunderstood. Just for your records here a discussion between your third/hero person and other agoner on tonearms: http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&255&4#255 http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&256&4#256 http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&276&4#276 http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&277&4#277 http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&278&4#278 http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&280&4#280 three times in a row in the same thread your hero was defeated. Have you enough or will come back for more? Regards and enjoy the music, R. |
As Audiogon has deleted the infamous Thread about Tonearm Geometry where Raul's ignorance was finally revealed to all......here is another Thread where Dertonarm exposes the Mexican again and again..... AGON BLACK KNIGHT |
Dear Halcro: Where are your facts? Why try to distract from the subject. Btw, is this your close friend and hero/Dertonarm?: http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?6502-Refund-problem It is clear yo have nothing on hand. You already exposed your knowledge level on the subject! Regards and enjoy the music, R. |
- 212 posts total