tobias, i think you misinterpret my position.
i believe all questions of quality in the realm of the arts is purely subjective and opinion based. whatever standards exist are still based upon opinion.
if i am trying to decide upon a cd to buy, a book to read, a movie to watch, a component to buy a concert. etc. , i want information, not opinion. i cannot necessarily base a decision upon an opinion with which i may agree or disagree, but as tvad illustrated, if i want to be confident an orchestra is playing like an ensemble and all instruments are tuned properly, his description is all i need. once i listen, i will decide my sentiments toward the performance.
if i want to buy an amplifier and ask if it is warm and define warmth, upon receiving a factual answer or at least one based upon honest perceptions, i can then make an intelligent decisions.
my point is that i have my own criterion as to what i enjoy. all i need is information as to the presence or absence of factors which i can use to make an intelligent decision.
life is a chance. if i want to make sure the pianist played all notes correctly etc., i will go to hear him/her play.
i cannot predict whether i will like or dislike what i hear.
there is to much persuasion out ther either implicit or explicit and not enough information.
as channel 5 says "we report, i will decide". this philosophy is consistent with my detached reviewing style.
i believe all questions of quality in the realm of the arts is purely subjective and opinion based. whatever standards exist are still based upon opinion.
if i am trying to decide upon a cd to buy, a book to read, a movie to watch, a component to buy a concert. etc. , i want information, not opinion. i cannot necessarily base a decision upon an opinion with which i may agree or disagree, but as tvad illustrated, if i want to be confident an orchestra is playing like an ensemble and all instruments are tuned properly, his description is all i need. once i listen, i will decide my sentiments toward the performance.
if i want to buy an amplifier and ask if it is warm and define warmth, upon receiving a factual answer or at least one based upon honest perceptions, i can then make an intelligent decisions.
my point is that i have my own criterion as to what i enjoy. all i need is information as to the presence or absence of factors which i can use to make an intelligent decision.
life is a chance. if i want to make sure the pianist played all notes correctly etc., i will go to hear him/her play.
i cannot predict whether i will like or dislike what i hear.
there is to much persuasion out ther either implicit or explicit and not enough information.
as channel 5 says "we report, i will decide". this philosophy is consistent with my detached reviewing style.