CD layer on hybrid SACD versus regular redbook


I recently (sadly) gave up on SACD. But I kept my hybrid discs figuring they are fine for CD playback. Is there any reason to believe that regular Redbook CDs will sound better than the CD layer of a Hyrbrid SACD?
dgaylin
You don't have to give up on anything Dgaylin. Get a Sony XA5400ES for about $1099 and you will finally understand why SACD can be special. On the other hand, the Redbook will blow you away. It is the first digital player/system I have owned (I've had $15K CDP's) that delivers tonal accuracy without digititus. It approaches vinyl but has no drawbacks. Don't quite understand completely why the XA5400ES is so good, but it is different then all my Levinsons, Wadia's, Meridian and MF stuff. The architecture is new and breaks some new gound for digital playback. As to the Hybrid disc, well? SACD's alone vary alot, as do the Hybrid discs. I have noticed that the RB layers seem to sound particularly bad vs the SACD layers...conspiracy? Maybe. Bottom line is that you need to live and learn what recordings are special...many of my RB recordings are far better than any SACD recording I own:O)
Dgaylin: My experience is that most of the time, the Hybrid layer with rbcd sound better than the CD itself. Maybe it is remastered, I do not know.
No, no, no. Buy a refurb Sony 595 at Sonystyle for $60. You will be very pleased with both SACD and CD sound. Just saved you $1,000.