Alex Chilton RIP

i'm (obviously) with martykl on this one--at the end of the day, it's all about the songs; the fact that zman's discarded bands took their inspiration from the prophet shouldn't ipso facto damn them to oblivion. virtually everyone is influenced by someone else--lots of unquestionably great acts (e.g. radiohead, nirvana, badfinger, the jam, etc.) borrowed heavily, sometimes slavishly, from their predecessors, yet still left behind classic work. i honestly consider that the dbs, posies, tommy keene and and a very few others working the same genre to be worth mentioning in the same revered company. of course, one's musical taste is inherently subjective; vive le difference.

Can't speak to all those bands, but there was certainly no reason to see GT live: Performances did not come close to having the effect of the recordings.

I grew up seeing Tommy Keene back in the day here in DC when he was on Limp, and knew him a bit though he was older than me. (We briefly crossed paths at UMD, where I "majored" in radio station by default. We also both played Gretsch 6120 thin double-cuts. Too bad for me I can't sing or write a song like him.)

LJ, there's no question about EVERYONE being influenced and taking inspiration from someone else. There is no other way, no one's reinventing the wheel even if you're James Brown or John Lennon. (Or Kurt Cobain, whose talent I admire but whose songs I only want to hear occasionally on the radio.) Or, very self-evidently to my mind, Alex Chilton, who really didn't come up with anything so terribly original as to be retrospectively credited with inventing a genre -- never quite understood that one. More like he was just really, really damn good, and got across that humanity with guts intact.

But what I think separates AC (and KC too) from most of the parade is that, 25 years hence, I don't think anyone's gonna be covering and taking their inspiration from most of the acts we've named. Real genius is a rare thing, that's why we crave hearing it.