Resampling my music collection

I didn't know this thing had a quote feature.

any other DSP process could be, say, a Meridian 808 CD player that upsamples to 176.4KHz

Learn to read by inference. By "any other DSP process" I mean any other software based DSP process, and I'm obviously excluding resampling when I use the phrase.
More explicitly, "any DSP process that is software based and not resampling," but it isn't elegant to write that out.

what makes you think that the software you will get your hands on will have some hidden gem software algorithm in it that has not yet been

I don't really understand the question. I think that Adobe Audition has the best resampling based on the link that was provided earlier in this thread. That's what I intend to use.

Adobe Audition can do de-emphasis with the Q10 plugin, but Q10 is only 32 bit. I have resigned myself to doing de-emphasis with sox, spitting out a 24 bit file, and then resampling it with Adobe Audition. Of course, not every CD I own has pre-emphasis, but a lot of the best ones do.

then wouldn't it be more elegant to find some software based DSP that also uses a quality SRC?

Wouldn't it be more powerful to use the best software resampler there is so I can then use whatever DSP I want?

Learn to read by inference.

Dnewhous, This is some something I try extremely hard NOT to do on Audiogon!! You MUST be new to this forum?? Keep trying your "read by inference" & see how much trouble you land yourself in! ;-) I've been down this path before (& so have many others here) - it's not something you want to try here on Audiogon, IMO. However, you can choose that style if you want to....
You need to understand that nobody knows what you are thinking - over here we are all communicating thru writing. There is no face-face contact, no way to see your facial expressions thus no way to know what your angle of the argument is. You need to be explicit.

By "any other DSP process" I mean any other software based DSP process, and I'm obviously excluding resampling when I use the phrase.
More explicitly, "any DSP process that is software based and not resampling," but it isn't elegant to write that out.

Ach, now we are getting clearer! why the heck did you not write this before?? what's with the "elegance" thing?? Brevity while excluding important info is NOT elegance! It's called "incomplete information". There is NOTHING "obvious" about your excluding resampling from the DSP process. It "obvious" ONLY in your mind & no one else's.
In due course you'll learn to not assume anything! ;-)
Anyway, we have wasted enough time extracting the required information from you. All the best in your resampling your music collection....