Hi Bob,
Re the use of radians vs. degrees, see the section on this page headed "Advantages of measuring in radians," which begins by stating:
Best regards,
-- Al
Re the use of radians vs. degrees, see the section on this page headed "Advantages of measuring in radians," which begins by stating:
In calculus and most other branches of mathematics beyond practical geometry, angles are universally measured in radians. This is because radians have a mathematical "naturalness" that leads to a more elegant formulation of a number of important results.I'm not certain, but I believe that the results of differentiating and integrating a sine or cosine function would be much less "clean" and easy to work with if degrees or cycles were used instead of radians.
Most notably, results in analysis involving trigonometric functions are simple and elegant when the functions' arguments are expressed in radians.
I understand that sine and cosine are out of phase by pi/2, but why do you say that one leads or lags the other?Just take any voltage level on one of the waveforms, such as a zero crossing or a peak level, and find the corresponding point on the other waveform. The two points will be pi/2 radians or 90 degrees apart, with one occurring first. Of course, for continuous waveforms a 90 degree lead is the same as a 270 degree lag, but characterizing it that way would not seem sensible physically. That would say that for a capacitor a voltage change precedes the corresponding current change, and for an inductor a current change precedes the corresponding voltage change. Given that capacitors resist instantaneous changes in voltage, and inductors resist instantaneous changes in current, viewing a 90 degree lead as a 270 degree lag would not work for a transient or non-continuous waveform.
What's the point of reference?
Best regards,
-- Al