Which way to go? Airport Express or USB interface


I'm thinking about creating a computer stereo with my Mac G4 and some set of devices, including an SS integrated amp. I've heard from a few computer tekkies and an audiophile friend, read some forums on Audiogon, and it's hard to fathom which means might provide best fidelity--the Airport Express wireless method or the USB audio interface method. Some say the source files are most important, but I can save data according to recommendation. It is the linkage/transfer system that concerns me--USB (16-bit or 24-bit) or wireless. I can attach (or not attach) an outboard DAC to either, then run an analog in to my integrated amp--correct?
128x128bblilikoi
There are a few shortcomings of the AE not yet mentioned. The DAC in the AE (which you would be using if you went straight from the AE to your preamp or integrated amp) is mediocre in comparison to a decent outboard DAC (at least that is the case in my system). Alternatively, with the AE, the ONLY way you you can connect to an outboard DAC is via a Toslink (optical) cable - actually it's not an ordinary Toslink, but one with a special mini-connector on one end. Toslink/optical seems to be the least desirable of the means of digital connection, with Coaxial methods being preferred by many as the better way to stream digital info. Indeed the USB route is limited to 16 bit (redbook CD). But then again some of the best DAC's are designed (intentionally) for 16 bit so I would not concern yourself over it.

If distance is not an issue (from your computer to your system), I'd suggest a USB DAC like the Benchmark, or use a USB convertor like the Waveterminal U24 which hooks up to your computer via USB and goes to your DAC via a coaxial connection. I use this solution and cannot tell it from my transport.

Marco
Before going with Airport Express, please check out Squeezebox and Soundbridge first. I bet you'd be a lot happier with either. Follow the link for a review of the latest Squeezebox.

http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/1205/slimdevices_squeezebox.htm
Read these two links:

http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue22/nugent.htm

http://www.wavelengthaudio.com/usbdac.html

and tell me if you still want to go with an Airport Express. If it's convenience you want, go with the Airport Express. If you want hi-fi performance from your Mac G4, get a USB-coupled DAC from someone like Wavelength Audio, Apogee Electronics or Ack! Industries (when their new USB option for the Ack! Dack! comes out).
Some misinformation appears above...

the USB connect has the potential for better performance since the Airport will convert everything to Apple Loseless

Apple Lossless is exactly that - lossless. There would be ZERO performance gain or loss. Both 802.11g and USB 1.1 have enough bandwidth to stream cd-quality audio so this is not an option. If anything, the Airport Express has an 8-second buffer that USB does not so there's additional protection against network dropouts if you're streaming audio in from the net.

Indeed the USB route is limited to 16 bit (redbook CD).

Neither USB nor 802.11g is limited to 16-bit/44.1 KHz. Both can handle increased bitrates, should that ever become important. It has absolutely no relevance in today's world, as the high definition formats are completely encrypted all the way to the DAC. That means there'll be no digital streaming of SACD or DVD-Audio anywhere!

some of the best DAC's are designed (intentionally) for 16 bit

Actually, all of the home/hi-fi DAC's are designed primarily for 16-bit input (even the dCS). It's only in the pro world where you would need to handle 24-bit streams.

Coaxial methods being preferred by many as the better way to stream digital info

With jitter correction circuits you won't notice the difference. I've tested USB into an M-Audio Audiophile through a $100+ Chord Prodac vs. the Airport Express and the Monster Cable optical and can't tell the difference.

I'd suggest a USB DAC like the Benchmark

The Benchmark DAC-1 doesn't have a USB input, and when I asked them about this earlier in the year they had no plans of adding one. I'd bet their space in that case is too cramped to add any more boards.

The bottom line is that the quality of sound you get out is in direct relation to the quality of the DAC. Everything else in the middle is pretty much irrelevant except when it comes to convenience.
I have been using the AE and loving it. I use a optical connection to my DAC in my BK Reference 20 and am quite please with the sound quality.