ah....iTunes as a "lossless encoder"....
Maybe I was getting prematurely excited when I saw "WAV"
My issue with Apple lossless is that there may be some weird, embedded, copyright type scheme in their algorithim.
OK... maybe its perfect, maybe its bit for bit, maybe it UNcompresses to WAV like perfection.
But what irritates me, given that hard drive space is only getting cheaper and that 30+ CD's, for example, should be more than enough for the gym, is why people havent just figured out WAV + TAGGING?
But hey if "there should be no sonic difference" than perhaps we are already there, just where we need to be?
But I have heard that before re MP3, which sounded like crap, even with cotton in my ears.
In any case, I am glad to see people focusing on this topic and Edesilva thanks again.
Maybe I was getting prematurely excited when I saw "WAV"
My issue with Apple lossless is that there may be some weird, embedded, copyright type scheme in their algorithim.
OK... maybe its perfect, maybe its bit for bit, maybe it UNcompresses to WAV like perfection.
But what irritates me, given that hard drive space is only getting cheaper and that 30+ CD's, for example, should be more than enough for the gym, is why people havent just figured out WAV + TAGGING?
But hey if "there should be no sonic difference" than perhaps we are already there, just where we need to be?
But I have heard that before re MP3, which sounded like crap, even with cotton in my ears.
In any case, I am glad to see people focusing on this topic and Edesilva thanks again.