Gammajo
No offense, but I think your question is a bit flawed in that it assumes there is a high correlation between price and performance.
$350,000 is a ridiculous price tag for any audio system, and is a function only of marketing and PT Barnum esque audacity in an increasingly affluent world.
It is possible that you might derive more musical satisfaction and enjoyment from a classic 70's system featuring a pair of the old Advents, than you might from whatever Stereophile is pimping their editorial content to these days.
I have only heard the Gallos in the less than ideal context of one of the hi fi shows but personally could not imagine them in even a $12,000 system and would guess they are closer to a "30" than a "90".
Trying to maximize your happiness per buck is a good idea, and I also see nothing wrong with scoring value or musical enjoyment for several systems as a way to come to terms with what you want to spend.
But again, in the end, the relationship between price and performance will not be linear.
What kind of music do you enjoy the most?
What are the qualities and size of your listening room?
Do you have any preferences based on past experience?
What size speakers can your room and/or furniture accomodate?
Armed with these questions, you can find the answers within these forums and buy all of the equipment from fellow Audiogoners for huge discounts.
If, hypothetically, the Wilson Watt Puppy System was an 80, the MAX system a 90 and the $350K system a 100...
I bet you could buy an earlier version of the Watt Puppies, a couple of excellent amps, and a reasonably serious front end for < $15,000 total, that would score a 75.
If for whatever reason you didnt like any particular item, you could probably recover your funds less only the price of shippng.
Good luck.
No offense, but I think your question is a bit flawed in that it assumes there is a high correlation between price and performance.
$350,000 is a ridiculous price tag for any audio system, and is a function only of marketing and PT Barnum esque audacity in an increasingly affluent world.
It is possible that you might derive more musical satisfaction and enjoyment from a classic 70's system featuring a pair of the old Advents, than you might from whatever Stereophile is pimping their editorial content to these days.
I have only heard the Gallos in the less than ideal context of one of the hi fi shows but personally could not imagine them in even a $12,000 system and would guess they are closer to a "30" than a "90".
Trying to maximize your happiness per buck is a good idea, and I also see nothing wrong with scoring value or musical enjoyment for several systems as a way to come to terms with what you want to spend.
But again, in the end, the relationship between price and performance will not be linear.
What kind of music do you enjoy the most?
What are the qualities and size of your listening room?
Do you have any preferences based on past experience?
What size speakers can your room and/or furniture accomodate?
Armed with these questions, you can find the answers within these forums and buy all of the equipment from fellow Audiogoners for huge discounts.
If, hypothetically, the Wilson Watt Puppy System was an 80, the MAX system a 90 and the $350K system a 100...
I bet you could buy an earlier version of the Watt Puppies, a couple of excellent amps, and a reasonably serious front end for < $15,000 total, that would score a 75.
If for whatever reason you didnt like any particular item, you could probably recover your funds less only the price of shippng.
Good luck.