t8kc
Responses from t8kc
| Ohm Walsh 4.300.2 opinions My advice is to buy the speakers and then configure your system to play them. I have a pair of Walsh Ohm 4XOs from the late 1980s and they sound great when played with my 300W Parasound amp. There is also a sub which takes some of the load off th... | |
| Is Old Music Killing New Music? "New music is killing new music" is my thought as well. I primarily look for music coming from new Blues artists who re-interpret the classics and come up with new tunes. To me, "pop" music is still pop music; commercially driven crap that is pu... | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? Looks like this is the all time most viewed and responded to speaker thread on this site! That is amazing. There is a lot of interest in the OHM speakers. The second place thread was a general one about "the best speaker". | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? @mapman Perhaps for the electronics, but the woodwork was done in Brooklyn as it took 6 months for delivery. The new subs use Danish (ICE) electronics with the woodwork done in NYC. | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? @melvinjames you are correct about the sequence.Honestly, I don't know how OHM made any money on the Micro Subwoofer series; the part is great quality for a low price (my 12" version cost $400 + shipping!).The replacement sub is $1,500. Granted it... | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? The OHM Micro Subwoofer 12 is a self-powered unit that takes the amp output and crosses it over internally. There are choices of cross-over points and a volume control. Since I first installed it, I have turned the volume down slightly as my wife ... | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? Going back to the need or not for subwoofers with Ohm speakers, I recently added a 12" OHM subwoofer to my old pair of 4XOs.The result surprised me somewhat. The bass response is hugely better than before. The speakers seem to perform better now t... | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? Thanks for posting the review link. I found it very interesting and agree with the opinions of the reviewer.I have owned Walsh 1, 2 and 4XO units. My Walsh 2s were upgraded about 5 years ago which made them much better. | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? I vote for the 2000 series. I have owned them before and they play well, but need a lot of power (at least mine did). My room is a similar size, but I settled on the 4000 series (4XO) as they deliver better bass.The room recommendations are only e... | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? Smile! | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? Take a take a fleshlight shine it in through the grill/can and see were the tweeter is, mark the orientation for future use..... Yes, I've heard that a Fleshlight can improve the tweeter orientation if used properly. I hadn't thought about marki... | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? Aren’t 4XO’s larger than 2.2000 as well? That + higher efficiency would definitely make them different and probably more adept at bass in a larger room with more amps. The Walsh 2.2000 just never sounded that good; slightly muddy and lacking... | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? Maybe it’s your room? My 2000s do fine with 150 watts per If the 4XOs sound good, why would the room cause the 2.2000s to sound bad? When I took the 2.2000 speakers to Peter's house, he couldn't believe how much power they needed to sound good... | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? With all that surface area and 2000 watts per side even a small movement will energize the room, no strain, no chuffing ports just pure energy......amazing. If you feel wanting for good deep vibrations.I can attest to Peter's subwoofer system; ... | |
| Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em? Peter, it sounds like you had a good time at the show, sorry I missed going. |