Four 8" woofers of good quality will always outperform a single 15" in terms of speed and resolution while providing about 15% more cone radiating area to move air.
This is a general statement, not withstanding the quality/performance of each driver.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well yes dual 6.5's do havea certain ~~Punch~~ in the bass whicha single 8 evena 10 might not mtach.
had the Thors been , if we can fantise a bit, over 91db sens, they would have made my perfect ideal speaker, But 87db, is ridiculously UN-sensitive.
So I have to give up deal 6.5's with Neodymium magnets.
A single 8 might be a bit limp in the bass vs dual 6.5's.
Perhaps not, if we throw in 95 db sensitivity on the single 8, might easily match dual 6.5's 87db.
10 inch with high sensitivity will bring my system all the bass i've been missing all these decades.
I'm expecting good things from the 10 in my full ~~cellos, double bass, timpini ~percussion~~orchestral recordings.
Building the cabinet now, for the 10, but will use the 8 til i order the 10.
Just going to stuff a bunch of fill in bottom section for the 8's parimeters.
This is a general statement, not withstanding the quality/performance of each driver.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well yes dual 6.5's do havea certain ~~Punch~~ in the bass whicha single 8 evena 10 might not mtach.
had the Thors been , if we can fantise a bit, over 91db sens, they would have made my perfect ideal speaker, But 87db, is ridiculously UN-sensitive.
So I have to give up deal 6.5's with Neodymium magnets.
A single 8 might be a bit limp in the bass vs dual 6.5's.
Perhaps not, if we throw in 95 db sensitivity on the single 8, might easily match dual 6.5's 87db.
10 inch with high sensitivity will bring my system all the bass i've been missing all these decades.
I'm expecting good things from the 10 in my full ~~cellos, double bass, timpini ~percussion~~orchestral recordings.
Building the cabinet now, for the 10, but will use the 8 til i order the 10.
Just going to stuff a bunch of fill in bottom section for the 8's parimeters.