A Copernican View of the Turntable System


Once again this site rejects my long posting so I need to post it via this link to my 'Systems' page
HERE
128x128halcro
Forgot to mention I have some very serious structure feedback issues at the TT in the other location - old building, suspended floors. Am looking at buying a TT shelf or building one for there. I sympathize with those of you with suspended floors.
Dear Chris, This remind me about this Jew who was complaining about his shoes:'they are killing me'. His answer about the cause was that they are too small. But when asked why he buys too small shoes his answer was: 'it feels so good when I put them off'. BTW I think that you have some other 'structural problems'. 'the other location' imply that you can use the 'other one' without 'structure feedback issue'.
Regards,
Hi Nikola
As long as I stayed in my chair it was very nice but loud - the vibrating chair added to the effect :^) . But sustained levels would not let me enjoy this hobby for very long. It did however start feeling like a shoebox at those levels when I got up to check the gear, walls, etc...

Yes the other building has many problems. Adding vinyl there exposed many of them. It will be a challenge.
Cheers
Addendum. Dear Chris, you made an important discovery without knowing what you discovered. Otherwise you would at least pronunce: Heureka. There is no way to value anything without comparison. Even 'better' assumes some, not to mention 'the best'. Alas your method is to expensive: two or more 'locations' are not attainable for the most of us. So I have a proposition which is even cheaper than Halcro's concrete arm pod. Buy the cheapest MM cart you can find ( I have some from East Germany) and
use it by every listing session for one hour and then switch to whatever other cart you own. You will be suprised with the result. BTW such results seems to be the 'basics' in psychology.

Regards,
Chris, maybe it is just me but this seems to be a bit confusing. You said you tried two tts on the side wall, "directly opposite the firing of one of my speakers". Does this mean one speaker is toed-in to such a degree that it is aimed at one of your tts?

Now perhaps a few points were suggested in my earlier comments that were not made clearly.

First, it is not always easy to differentiate between airborne and structure borne vibrations. After I moved my tt, it was then located in a position with less structural bracing (likely bad), yet it sounded cleaner. So in my case I must infer the minimizing of airborne interference was a net gain over the increase in structure vibrations.

Second, I think a lot can be understood about equipment location from the study of speaker interface with the room. It seems to be understood that where three planes intersect (any corner) you will find the greatest build up of bass nodes. (Insert assumption that bass frequencies have more energy, thus are more detrimental than higher frequencies.) While the corner of my alcove may not have been as severe as a room corner with longer walls, my experience (two shorter walls and a large shelf = three planes) still supports this point. Less of a problem with bass node build up may be realized where two planes meet -- two walls, a wall and floor or ceiling. Further reduction occurs with only one plane (along a wall and up from the floor) while the least airborne interference may be away from all walls and the floor, while admitting this may be the least practical.

I believe this also relates to Jim Smith's recommendations in "Get Better Sound" when he promotes side wall equipment locations over front wall between the speakers.

Conclusion: try locating your tt/arm/cartridge where there will be the least bass node build up.