ARC LS 25MKl vs LS 25MKll....?????

I don't know who was telling you that, but I must respectfully disagree. I have basically the same set up as you. I started off with the MKI and had it upgraded to the MKII. After the upgrade, it is MUCH more open sounding.

Foreverhifi;
You are quite misinformed. I upgraded from an ARC LS2B MKI to a MKII and found the improvements significant in musical terms. The MKII was less mechanical sounding, more transparent and refined with enhanced musicality. Also, I suppose the "MK25" that Foreverhifi alluded to is the ARC LS25 MKI. The LS25 MKI is an excellent preamp, especially if used with NOS 6H23 tubes. Sometimes "a little knowledge can be a very dangerous thing." (I own both the LS2B MKII and the LS25 MKI preamps.)

Anyone know how significant the improvement from LS25 MkII to the Ref 1 or Ref 2? I'm considering all three of these linestages. I previously owned an LS15 with NOS Tungsram tubes. It was a good value linestage, but I'd like to take it a step or two higher. Thanks!

Hi Rick.

You should also throw the LS5 MkIII in the mix. To alot of people's ears, mine including, The LS5 MkIII betters the REF1 and although I haven't as yet heard the LS25 MkII, imagine it may be better also.

Prior to the introduction of the REF 1, The LS5 MkII was ARC's top of the line preamp. From what I have read, ARC introduced the MkIII version in response to an outcry by those how had recently bought new Mk II's which ARC simply abandoned to bring the REF 1 to market.

The MkIII has the same circuit boards as the REF1 but with a beefier power supply. The LS5 MkIII just sounds more musical versus the more analytical sound of the REF 1. The LS5 series has the magical midrange sound of ARC versus the current house sound.

Anyway, just a thought. Good Luck, Mike.