Aurender

@mkdm11

I enjoyed my time with N20 immensely (paired with EMM Labs DA2). I believe N20 holds a sweet spot if you can utilize all of its brilliant features. As far as settings goes, my recommendation would be to play with each setting and keep what sounds best to your ears. The same applies to digital output, AES vs USB. All of these choices are subjective…I guess my point is it would be a shame to not explore all the features on a transport like N20 :-)

When I had my N20, I did not prefer any upsampling or DSD conversion. I had my N20 connected using both AES (for files upto 24bit/192kHz) and USB for DSD’s. Another thing I really appreciated was CLM (critical listening mode) in N20. It further drops the noise floor and allows you appreciate quiet passages and space between instruments.

Use best digital cables you can afford. And lastly, if you have not yet; tweak your Ethernet signal with a passive filter from Network Acoustics’s ENO or Muon. They will further relax the sound and take off any digital edge or grunge.

I intentionally held back my feedback on one of the most important feature of N20, the clock input. PM me if you are curious about the master clock input. 

Would you please share rest of your system?

Lalita,

Thank you for the response/insight.

I don`t domuch upsampling, I am having better success with NOS at the DAC (44k) via USB. THE Aurender is set similarly at basic levels.  (I guess thats where my confusion originates. (Tons of options,, basic sounds best,, concerned I am overlooking something). I have AES "Front Row", USB AQ Coffee and Nodost SPDIF. From the Modem Small Green Computer to Fibre, back to ethernet to English Switch, AQ Vodka to N20.

Pre BAT REX II, AMP PASS XA60.8, 2 REL S510`s, Paradigm Persona F7, All Frey 2, Equi-Tek power conditioner.

Ted Smith, the PS Audio engineer/designer/educator cleared up my I2s misconceptions.  Paul has promoted I2s as being superior because of the shared clock..at least this was my interpretation of what he said.  Ted explained that USB and I2s are processed the same.  Any clock signal supplied by I2s is ignored.  The main downside to USB is the noise created by the power running parallel to the data line.  I contacted Tim at Kitsune HiFi and it seems that USB/I2s are handled by the Holo the same way.

op

we can use any hard drive as per the teac ripper it doesnt add much to the cost and having a ripper can be nice addition.

Carlsbad you do need cpu horsepower to run roon the aurender cpu is not capable  of running Roon got that directly from aurender at axponna a few years ago.

it is not a matter of performance some of the worlds best servers run Roon including the $35,000.00  Taiko Extreme the innous statement the 432EVO servers 

all of these products are cores and endpoints in one 

Dave and Troy

Audio intellect nj

roon server experts

@lordmelton with all due respect, from two of this threads contributors, it was my understanding that using a NAS defeated the main premise of Aurender’s proprietary “signal” path. I don’t think what I said was “incorrect” as you put it but if you’re ok with how Aurender handles its signal chain then this may be your component. For me, I don’t need or want proprietary built in HDDs. I like the flexibility of a NAS, and not something that’s proprietary. So like I said, I’d look elsewhere, and Lumin fits fits my needs if I wanted to throw more money at this situation. For now, a Node with an external linear power supply, a great digital interconnect, my DAC and a NAS gives me audiophile bliss. What’s wrong with that?