B&W D3 vs. Monitor Audio Platinum II


I'm starting to think about speaker upgrades now, possibly in the next 5-10 months or so.  I would like to upgrade my left/center/right speakers to something new.  I currently have the B&W 805 D2 / HTM2 D2 with a Krell S1200 and Emotiva XPR-1 amps.   I have read a lot about D2 vs D3 so I am well aware of how B&W has changed.

My short list has come down to these two choices:

- B&W 805 D3 and HTM1 D3

- Monitor Audio Platinum PL100 II and PLC350 II

Please do not respond with messages such as "B&W sucks and Monitor is awsome".  I'm sure that either of these choices would be a good choice.  What I would like is comments from people who have heard both and can describe the sonic character of each speaker or discuss the differences in an objective fashion.  I have read about other brands such as Wilson, Focal, Sonus Faber, Martin Logan.  I have come down to the B&W or Monitor Audio on my short list.

auxinput
I'd go for the 805 D3 over PL100 II's from what I've heard. With that said the PL200 II's and up are very good speakers and I wouldn't even consider B&W D3 series over them. 
auxinput,
I really enjoy them, but one man's medicine is another man's poison! We have a crazy, crazy hobby!
@james_w514 - I can't do floor standers.  I would have to limit the left/right channels to bookshelves because they need to sit on top of my subwoofers.  They are gigantic subs that I built myself.  They are about the same size as a SVS PB16-Ultra. lol.
An important thing to note on your research, just for future readers: the monitor audios aren’t ribbons, they’re AMT drivers, which are effectively much faster/livelier that dynamic drivers, as in the B&W or ribbons for that matter. I own the Platinum 100 mk1, and it definitely doesn’t lack excitement, and is certainly not forgiving on the source material - it is extremely revealing/quick.
They don’t have the treble spike/bump that B&W always put in, so they may not sound as bright as the B&W d3.