2. amps-preamps
  3. 137268-517

Backert Labs Rhumba preamp

Hello,
I am thinking of going to an active line stage for sometime now. I have a separate thread for that and people have suggested some good choices. The reason for this thread if that, while I have all along said that  don't want tubes in the system, a few have convinced me that I should try tubes in the system, especially with ProAcs.
With that said, I researched a few tube preamps, that have XLR out and the Backert Labs Rhumba is the one that has only 2 tubes, which makes me comfortable to "deal in tubes".

I would like to hear from Backert Labs Rhumba owners who moved from Solid State preamplification to this preamp. What are the differences you heard? Any improvements?

I read a review on the Stevehoffman forum and the user mentioned that there is a "hum" in this preamp. This bothers me and hence I decided to check on this forum, if anyone has experienced this with the Rhumba in their system. One poster on this forum also confirmed the "hiss":
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/backert-preamps-any-users

So I was wondering, if there are any users who have recently purchased this preamp and what is their experience with the hum/hiss issue.

BTW, I blame Ralph of Atma-Sphere, Almarg  and my dealer for making me consider tube amps :-) Can't believe I am creating this thread.

Thanks!
128x128milpai
atmasphere's avatar
atmasphere
11,844 posts
 
The MP3 may be really good, but is currently out of my price range and also comfort (no. of tubes) range.
@milpai The Rhumba is a line stage. If you get the MP-3 as a line stage, it only has 4 tubes. The remaining tubes you are probably thinking about are for the optional phono section. The MP-3 has a polarity inversion switch.

sbank's avatar
sbank
3,379 posts
 
Since I know Andy really well, and sorta know Ralph as a former customer, I won't go on in any detail here, but wanted to point out that it's pretty cool that both the Backert & Atma-Sphere gear is voiced by performing (in Andy's case -- professional) musicians. That may not matter to you, but I think it's cool and perhaps relevant. Cheers,
Spencer
atmasphere's avatar
atmasphere
11,844 posts
 
@sbank Thanks- I often wonder what people mean when they use the word 'voice' in that manner. I've often interpreted as some sort of tonality? - but it could mean something else. FWIW we don't do anything to compensate our circuits for bandwidth, and while we do listen to the gear of course, we don't do that until we've optimized for least distortion and maximum headroom.

From what
milpai's avatar
milpai OP
2,404 posts
 
@sbank ,Thank You for the reference. It does help to know this detail because reviewers have a different expectations than designers.
sbank's avatar
sbank
3,379 posts
 
@atmasphere Ralph, when I said "voice" I certainly wasn't implying that you are doing anything to taint the signal, but rather that when listening and developing designs your judgements are coming from a musician's perspective. For example, trying different types of wire and making choices of what sounds most realistic.
I have heard stories from Andy at Backert such as "we spent the day listening to impact of ten different capacitors". 
Glad you guys do that so we can enjoy the fruits of your labor. Cheers, 
Spencer 
More to discover