I had dual REL T/5X subs but could not get them to integrate to my satisfaction with the Harbeths. The T Series RELs are really low end re enforcement rather than deep below 30 hz subs unless you move up to their bigger units. I liked the low end of the Harbeths which are -3db at 45 hz and my frequency analyzer shows output below 35hz. The RELs we’re just doubling up the natural low end of the Harbeths and it had a negative effect on soundstage and openness.
Benchmark AHB2 in Mono Block Configuration
Hi:
I've owned the Benchmark ABH2 Amp for a few years but am now considering one two alternative upgrade paths:
A New Amp or adding a second AHB2. If I purchase a new amp so far I like the Bryston 3BCubed which is a dual mono design with 200 watts into 8 ohms or possibly the 4BCubed at 300 watts. In either case this is more power than the single ABH2 at 100 watts into 8 ohms. However adding a second ABH2 increases the power per channel to 380 watts .
So much for raw power. What about overall sound quality? The Bryston 3BCubed got an excellent review on Absolute Sound as an amp that would require significantly more $$ to better. Another review I read easily preferred the Bryston 43Cubed (300 watts per channel) over the ABH2.
I'm in the process of completely upgrading my system after several years of the same components. I will shortly have:
An Aurender N20 Streamer into an MSB Discrete DAC with dual power supplies feeding the single ABH2 which drives my Harbeth C7es-XD speakers.
Everything will be new except the older ABH2. Hence the consideration of an amp upgrade.
Now Benchmark will tell you that adding a second ABH2 is only needed when the single amp clips. Other than that there is no sonic benefit to adding a second. I Ffnd that hard to believe. I would think having a second would offer improved soundstage, separation and possibly better performance from the speakers. So my question is:
Have any of you added a second ABH2 and if so what were the overall sonic benefits if any? Also any opinion or experience on the Brystons vs the Benchmark? Or any suggestions of a better upgrade path would be welcomed.
- ...
- 36 posts total
@jfrmusic Luxman and CODA are known to have great synergy with Harbeths. Take a look at their integrated amps and even separates. I would definitely not add another Benchmark. It’s not going to be on the level of your digital front end. |
@jfrmusic btw worth exploring what folks use with this level of digital and your speakers on a Harbeth forum. |
You have insane source equipment roughly $26K retail. However, you're feeding this signal into a $3500 amp. This is a big system imbalance no matter how good the perception of the Benchmark is (yes, it plays well above its price). I would not scrimp on a new amplifier, considering it appears you have a healthy budget. The world of audio amplifiers is your oyster. Give the source components a chance to sing! |
You can easily try the AHB2 with the option to return. Is there anyway to demo the Bryston with an option to return it? Even if this cost a few hundred for the trial, it would be worth it. Ideally, you would have both for a week or so and then decide for yourself. I don’t think you will know how they sound to your ear, in your system, and your room unless your try them both. I have an AHB2 and have read many reviews and you might like either one better. The 4B3 is about $7500 and two AHB2 are $7000 so the reality is they are about the same retail price. At the end of the day, both are detailed SS amps with a great reputation so either way it will sound great. Please keep us posted because I may be making a similar decision some day. Given what you spent on the front end, are you going to change your speakers as well? |
- 36 posts total