Break in time that extends to months or maybe even years!!


On another thread, we have a well known and well respected piece of gear ( and great sounding too, IME) that according to the member who is reviewing it, needs in excess of 1000 hours to fully break in!! 

While we have all heard of gear that needs immense amounts of 'break in' time to sound its best, usually gear that involves teflon caps, I question whether this very long break in time is the job for the consumer? Is it reasonable for a manufacturer of audio gear to expect the consumer to receive sub-par performance from his purchase for potentially several months ( years?) before the true sound of the gear in question can be enjoyed? Or, is it ( or should it be) perhaps the job of the manufacturer of this gear ( usually not low priced) to actually accomplish the 'break in' before releasing it from the factory? Thoughts...
128x128daveyf
I like Douglas Schroeder's claim. Re-enforces my idea of buying used.  
Well, I am a cheapo also, but don't tell anyone.
McCormack amps take about 48 hrs to laser beam their magic into my ears,
my speakers took about 250-300 hrs to loosen up and get tight, and amazing.


There is a difference.

Before a serious,listen, I will power up, leave on for 30-40 hrs before a good listen, same with preamp and CD player.



1000 hrs seems a stretch, who claims such a break in?

 I have been break g in a pair of Odyssey Kismets for many weeks now,and yes big difference from day one til now!

i would think 400 or so hours on any capacitor, circuit board, would be sufficient for a good break in.

1000 hours seems odd to me.



Davey, good one!  :)

Perhaps you would enjoy my serious take on the subject. Go to Dagogo.com and read my article ;  Audiophile Law: Thou Shalt Not Overemphasize Burn In.