Well my speculation is that if crossed over at high frequency to two or more good powered subs to enable higher spl without breakup, the metas would get pretty close to Blades in sound. Just speculating. Good quality monitors + powered subs set up well are almost always a more cost effective way to achieve a high level of performance. Ls 50 metas are very very good…..again within their limits while one would expect Blades to remove those limits.
Can a set of Ls50 metas surpass or equal a set of Kef blade metas with subwoofers
I recently purchased a nice set of Ls50 metas off a fellow audiogoner..l have them on 33 in. stands in a large room.They are powered by a Hafler XL600(450x2) @ 4ohm.The metas are rolled off at 140hz.Behind the metas there are 2 line arrays of 6 (12 total)1000 watt velodyne 8In. Sealed subs.next to those there are 4-12 in. Subwoofers in sealed boxes with radiators tuned to 25hz,powered by 2 Crown K2's .l have a Mcintosh front end and lm using electronic crossovers.Everything is in phase,level matched and tweaked... Sounds amazing and effortless. I keep looking at the blades and wondering if there any better at 35,000 dollars...Aesthetically probably yes...Does anyone know if the blades have a better UNI Q driver?
- ...
- 40 posts total
- 40 posts total