When you say, RFI, are you talking radio frequency interference, or in general, electro-magnetic interference (EMI)?
@antinn Thanks for your comments!
RFI, not EMI. The RFI is caused by the tank circuit created by the cartridge inductance and tone arm cable capacitance. It is driven into excitation by the cartridge energy.
Don’t really buy the RFI argumentation, sorry. Putting aside simple and super cheap solutions like grid stoppers existing for decades, I cannot see how the RFI conspires to always give the effects exactly mimicking underloaded (high R) cartridge.
@bydlo Grid stoppers amazingly are not used in all phono preamps! Some designers have ’not heard the gospel’ so to speak ;( But more to your point, I’ve yet to see an audio circuit that sounds right if it is having problems with RFI. The ’cartridge loading resistor’ detunes the tank circuit at the input of the preamp. With most preamps if they are RFI sensitive, this will cause them to be less bright as there will be less intermodulation. Intermodulation contributes to brightness as the ear converts all forms of distortion into tonality.
the cart model of Shure brothers analyzed there is *unloaded* (plus the current source is strangely drawn with series (??) instead of parallel source impedance). The R on the schematics is the mechanical damping of the suspension, not the loading R.
Shure to my knowledge never made a LOMC cartridge. My comments about RFI relate only to low output cartridges. MM cartridges are an entirely different matter, as the resonant peak is often at or near the top of the audio band. They are also capable of ringing at audio frequencies as their inductance is so much higher, so to use a MM effectively, proper loading **is** required.