Reading digits off a spinning disk has inherent errors up to 5 percent depending on the condition of the disk and the quality of the transport and laser. Dacs essentially have to guess where the missing information is based on algorithms. Once you had cheap enough buffers like the original ps audio rom systems the errors were gone. Now with solid media the digits can be stored without error and served yo an asynchronous dac. No matter how good your CD player is, the process is flawed and outdated.I have worked for 10 years as software developer on making CD test disc equipment, that is for example for CD pressing plants and CD drive manufacturers.
now there are data issues when you rip your cds to memory that are probably not audible,
Not many has used the physical Red book or the different orange books, for implementing measurements parameters that verifies the wording in those from Sony and Philips.
So that drive manufacturers can make sure that they can play a disc that meets the standard. And that CD manufacturers can make sure that they make discs that fulfill the requirements/standard. In those books.
A CD drive and a CD disc use many techniques to ensure that the data is error free. Will not bore you with all of the technical details. One small example, there is in the red book standard that do not allowed there to be ANY un-correctable errors at all.
That parameter is called in the industry for "E32". It must be 0 otherwise it is out of specification.
What happens when a drive can't correct a error (that is all happening BEFORE entering the DAC) on a scratched/bad CD disc and get E32.
It puts out a error and stops reading/playing the disc.
In other words there is not a single bit that is in error from the drive that is going to the DAC. All data is fine and correct. And if the data is not guaranteed to be OK then you don't get anything. (100% correct or nothing.)
So I don't know where the horrible and completely flawed, misinformation in the quote is coming from!