Well, most of people on this forum (including you) think that SMPS is noisy and linear power supply is better. This believe comes from bad rap of noisy crude computer SMPS applications. They don't even realize that "Linear" power supply is a primitive unregulated switcher. I addition, many believe that when something is smaller and more efficient something else has to give (that's human nature). They apply this believe to both SMPS and class D amplifiers (that are basically controlled SMPS). In view of that amplifier manufacturers would be stupid not to keep using "Linear" power supplies. Only few true pioneers like Jeff Rowland had courage to develop state of the art SMPS supplies that are extremely quiet (noise very easy to filter out at 1MHz operation). Even 50kHz SMPS executed well are far better than "Linear" supplies IMHO.
Class D Technology
So I get the obvious strengths of Class D. Efficiency, power output & running cool which allows for small form factors. I also understand the weaknesses somewhat. 1. Non-linear & lots of distortion that needs to be cleaned up with an output filter.
So my question is, if it weren't for efficiency & power, would there be any reason to own a Class D amp? Do they beat Class A in any other categories that count for sound quality?
So my question is, if it weren't for efficiency & power, would there be any reason to own a Class D amp? Do they beat Class A in any other categories that count for sound quality?
- ...
- 527 posts total
- 527 posts total