Classic Ortofon Cartridges: The MC2000 MK II or the MC3000 MK II?

When reading the latest reveals by Ortofon on their Cadenza Range of
MC's they are more interested in informing on the advancements in selected for Materials use in the assembly within the Housing .

They do not focus in on any special properties about the Cantilevers in use, but do reference the Aluminium Cantilevers in use.
The Bronze Model is identified as having a Conical Aluminium where as the others in the range are Aluminium.
Again the conical shape could be used, as it has proved to impact on the Sound Produced and separates the Bronze allowing it to be noticeably different to the Siblings.
It might just be a better material to mount the Replicant Stylus onto.

I am not sure how many of the contributors to this thread will be in a position to debate the metallurgy of the Ortofon Cadenza Range of cantilevers 35 Years on from now .      

My first enigma was the so called ''Greek lier paradox'', The Greek who stated that ''all Greek are liers''. The other was how Greek
succeeded to convince ''Slavic immigants'' on the Balkan to believe in ONLY ONE GOD while they were polytheisic originaly? There are many theories about this ''issue''. However nobody try ''economic kind''. Consider the case with 12 Gods  but with only 10 goats. Back than the ''integrity issue'' deed not exist. So trying to ''corrupt'' Gods was not an issue. But well with the problem how to please 12 of them with only 10 goats? Probaly because man are regarded as more valuable ''working force'' the daughters were ''logicaly'' considered to be less ,uh, valuable. So ''ONLY  two of those'' were needed to please all 12 Gods. Well the Greek deed not need more arguments then  that ONE GOD is much cheaper. 

Al2O3 - https://global.kyocera.com/prdct/fc/list/material/alumina/alumina.html
In laboratories and high tech it's used very often. 

@lewm

If you and Raul believe that an aluminum oxide by itself can qualify as a ceramic after appropriate processing, ok.

Thats not what I said. Nowhere did I say "after appropriate processing".
I dont know why, but you are forever rephrasing other folks posts, including misrepresenting what they have said.

Let me spell it out for you

Aluminium Oxide is a ceramic oxide.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/aluminum-oxide

Yikes, I didn't think body materials would lead to such a lively discussion. Given the hardness of the body used on the MC3000 MK II, which the Stereophile review says almost 9 on the Moh Scale of Hardness, while that scale shows titanium being 6. Apparently hardness is only part of the equation for resonance issues that are considered in body design. 

Nevertheless, all I was really trying to say is that this is a nice sounding cartridge. In the past I have had the Cadenza Red, Blue, Bronze, original Windfeld, and A90 in my systems. While each of these cartridges had a different presentation, I would say I find this Ortofon to be very close to being on equal footing. With the possible exception of the A90, but that cartridge has a unique presentation and kind of stands apart from other Ortofon cartridges. 

It may very well be possible that there are a level of differences that my system is not up to the task of presenting. Actually I find the tables I use to have very similar presentations, and this may be an end result of colorations further down the equipment chain. So lets talk about the system 

Speakers  JBL 4365 and pair of Velodyne HGS 12 subwoofers
Amplifier   AVM Audio AMP Essential monoblocks
Pre-Amplifier  Halcro DM 8
Phono Stage Esoteric E-03
Speaker wire  Wireworld Eclipse 8
Interconnects  Wireworld Silver Eclipse 8
Power cords  Pi Audio Group 
Power Conditioner  TLP Audio TF130 (previous one was a PS Audio P10)

Turntables 

Scheu Audio Das Laufwerk No2/Dynavector DV505/Ortofon MC 3000 II or Ikeda 9 Kawami

Well Tempered Reference/ZYX 4D

SOTA Cosmos Eclipse/SME V/Transfiguration Audio Proteus

There are differences in presentation to all three tables, but there are many many similarities. The SOTA is the most expansive and dynamic, while the WTR is a bit more rounded and relaxed, and the Scheu falls closer to the WTR tonally but a bit more defined and dynamic. 

Perhaps there are limitations in my gear that homogenize the sound. Perhaps one day I get tired of playing with tables and consolidate them into one top tier table I can afford and call it good. Use the digital rig for casual listening and simplify things with one table and a pair of cartridges. Maybe that happens one day, but probably not next week. 

I think the next step is to obtain a different SUT than the ones I have had and see what happens. To be honest this is a casual cartridge, so I don't want to spend multiple thousands on a SUT for a cartridge that cost me $900. But on the other hand, I don't want to kludge the whole thing together either. Perhaps I will look at vintage transformers and see what can be done that way.