From my perspective as one having been adversely affected by such dealers and manufacturers like that presented by CPT, one usually gets a radio silence response. I’m confused as to why CPT continues to stoke to flames with illusory promises of a potential buyer.
When there is a bonafide offer or interest by a third party to acquire a company’s assets, including IP, one doesn’t hear a word about the ongoing transaction behind the scenes until after the deal is done. In fact, from my dealings in doing due diligence of such acquisitions, the parties are usually bound by a confidentiality agreement that bars the parties from even discussing the most superficial aspects of the review. The reasons stem from concerns of not negotiating in good faith if such disclosures were made. All of this leads me to believe that as well-intended the above posts are about a prospective buyer, it’s not credible.
When there is a bonafide offer or interest by a third party to acquire a company’s assets, including IP, one doesn’t hear a word about the ongoing transaction behind the scenes until after the deal is done. In fact, from my dealings in doing due diligence of such acquisitions, the parties are usually bound by a confidentiality agreement that bars the parties from even discussing the most superficial aspects of the review. The reasons stem from concerns of not negotiating in good faith if such disclosures were made. All of this leads me to believe that as well-intended the above posts are about a prospective buyer, it’s not credible.