"03-13-15: Rlwainwright
>>Do you really think that having a 20 year transferable warranty costs the company money? <<
Yes, it does. It may not be a lot of money, but having a very long warranty DOES incur additional costs for the company."
I read an interview with Stuart Taylor, and when asked about the warranty, he said they make more money because the 20 year warranty is in place, not less. Its very rare that they actually get a piece back that fails from something covered under warranty.
"Once again, what the heck does this have to do with the discussion at hand? You would be well advised to think a bit more carefully about the words you commit to this discussion...
-RW-"
Sorry, but I say whatever I want. I don't really give a rat's ass if you, or anyone else has a problem with that.
>>Do you really think that having a 20 year transferable warranty costs the company money? <<
Yes, it does. It may not be a lot of money, but having a very long warranty DOES incur additional costs for the company."
I read an interview with Stuart Taylor, and when asked about the warranty, he said they make more money because the 20 year warranty is in place, not less. Its very rare that they actually get a piece back that fails from something covered under warranty.
"Once again, what the heck does this have to do with the discussion at hand? You would be well advised to think a bit more carefully about the words you commit to this discussion...
-RW-"
Sorry, but I say whatever I want. I don't really give a rat's ass if you, or anyone else has a problem with that.