It seems that his thread has devolved into a game of who can post the most links or repeat their argument the most times. I will not play that game, but rest assured, if I did, there are tens of thousands of readily available references documenting the effectiveness of the vaccine and its safety. I have looked at all of the posted links in this thread and addressed some already, but it seems that most of them are now links to politically motivated right wing propaganda sites. Sorry for the length, but I am not sitting here ready to reply to each and every post as it is made. Posting the sources can help to elucidate the motivation. For instance:
https://noqreport.com/2021/07/02/as-adverse-reactions-to-covid-vaccines-reaches-400000-the-truth-must-be-spread-widely/
NOQreport is It is considered a far right low credibility, conspiracy theory site by:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/noq-report/
https://rumble.com/vnbv86-winning-the-war-against-therapeutic-nihilism-and-trusted-treatments-vs-unte.html
Since September 2020 Rumble has been part-owned by none other than Dan Bongino a right wing political figure and host of Fox news “Unfiltered”. I wonder what his motivations are?
Mahgister, your link:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837543_Analysis_of_COVID-19_vaccine_death_reports_from_t...
seems to be in direct contradiction to your proposal that only the elderly and infirm should receive vaccines against CV-19. The data analyzed in this paper in figure 7 shows VAERS reported deaths from 2017,18,19, and 2020 compared to this year’s data as of April 1 2021. There is a large rise in VAERS 2021 death reports. The data from Jan 2021 through April 2021 would in large part be represented by the over 75 age group, which were among the first to be approved for vaccinations in the US. If the vaccine was responsible for this increase in VAERS death reports, maybe the old and infirm should be excluded from vaccinations? But, alas, even the authors conclude that of the 250 of these 1600 deaths that they tried to find an actual clinical cause of death for, only 13 of these 250 cases (5%) implicated the vaccine as the most likely cause of death. VAERS does not in any way claim that post vaccination death reports were in any way related to the vaccination. To make that assumption is incorrect as detailed on the VAERS site itself.
And, last for today, a medical paper written by a population health geographer (raise your hand if you knew there was such a profession?) and a high school student.
https://trialsitenews.com/population-wide-epidemiological-geography-demonstrates-vaccination-doesnt-correlate-to-reduction-in-sars-cov-2-infection/
Almost the whole left end of their international data scatterplot is driven by 19 African countries with very low vax rates, but there are a host of reasons why the rates of Covid-19 infection are exceedingly low in Africa, among them are: early border closures, 55% rural, just 3% over the age of 65, open air ventilation in homes, very low median age of 19.7 years, lower expression of ACE-2 receptor which is the gateway for lung infection, and far fewer pre-existing conditions like diabetes, hypertension etc. Without those dubious data points clustered to the lower left, the trendline would have the opposite and expected slope. Here is a link that explains the reason for low Covid cases in Africa.
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210818/Why-have-COVID-19-caseloads-been-comparatively-low-in-Africa.aspx.
As the health geographist’s medical paper continues, the premise of the US analysis seems to be akin to trying to learn how to raise cattle by studying ground beef. Studying single time point case increases county by county in a situation where the case number profile has looked like 50 different roller coaster profiles at the state level, let alone county level has obvious limitations. There are huge demographic variations in counties – population density, rural vs. urban, proximity to medical facility and case reporting, affordability for care, etc. To chop the data into small pieces and not analyze these parameters seems extremely shortsighted. But the author is a geographer, and as is often said “to a man with a hammer most things look like nails”. The recent surge of the Delta variant has altered the curves, and increased infection rates. The vaccination efficacy as well as natural immunity have been declining over time further muddying up this analysis.
VAERS is continually brought up. VAERS data does NOT link the adverse effects or deaths as being CAUSED by vaccinations. It says so on their site. Any claims making this assumption are in error. Finally, a link of my own from the Nebraska School of Medicine about this.
https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/does-vaers-list-deaths-caused-by-covid-19-vaccines
I will not likely participate further in this thread as it has become clear that no one will change their minds regarding vaccination. It has certainly been an interesting exercise, but sadly little more than a pointless exercise.