DCS Sending Legal Notice To Reviewer (Golden Sound) Over an Old Review of Their Bartok DAC

This is tragic mistake and an unforced error by dCS. 

Here at FutureAudiophile.com we've mistakenly bailed others out of anti-free speech issues such as Eric Alexander at Tekton Design. He foolishly attacked a YouTuber who measures some of his speakers. He laid empty threats on him and at the same time off-put his direct-to-the-customer clientele. Ouch. dCS did the same here.

If anybody would study Bose Vs. Consumer Union, we would know that there is a strong Supreme Court First Amendment precedent set that you can a) buy gear and review it and b) that doesn't remove your right to share your opinions. 

I know the VP of Marketing of dCS from his days at Wilson Audio and even before that. He should have known better.

In the event that there are any people here who don't understand the power of their vote this fall - your rights are being taken from you by a political party and a "dictator on day one" (his words not mine) is the end of your rights like free speech. The good news is that we aren;t dead yet. Vote to protect your rights because if you don't, you wont have any. 

Jerry

I gotta call BS Jerry.

Those aren’t his words.

If you want the truth, you can easily find transcripts of the exact conversation.

Something tells me you’re not interested in the truth…

First amendment ONLY applies to the government trying to limit free speech.

Listen to the lawyer who spoke earlier.

This has absolutely nothing to do with the First Amendment right to free speech.

I like the 5 star rating system from people that own products. Everyone can throw in their 2 cents comment. Professional reviews, not needed. Reviews are opinions no matter from a reviewer, or owner. That would work for me if I was looking for a rig.

I felt that Goldensound presents his case very clearly and substantiated with evidence. BUT - I think there is one considerable discrepancy between the accounts of each party.  Goldensound asserts that he was not alerted to the specifics of what DCS asserted were incorrect statements in Goldensound’s 2021 Bartok review, until 7 months later when the lawyer sent the note.

Meanwhile, the DCS response seems to assert that they did take every opportunity to alert Goldensound to the specifics of what DCS felt were false statements in Goldensound’s Bartok review.

I’m not sure - am I interpreting this right?  If so both parties can’t be right on this perspective and I think the truth on this particular matter would change how the community views the claims of each party.