It would seem that even in a high-end forum site such as this, discussions devolve into childish attacks. Lots of psychological tricks being played here. I’ll summarize:
1. If you can’t hear the difference, then your system must be crap. You clearly haven’t spent enough money and may as well be sporting Bose all over the house.
2. Science is fungible. When it comes to the laws of physics and electronics, we like to consider those to be "guidelines".
3. If you can’t hear the difference, it must be your poor hearing - clearly you are not a golden ear, nor do you possess the auditory faculties to understand the remarkable differences.
I find #3 to be particularly amusing, since I’d guess that most of the people here with disposable incomes large enough to spend five figures on wires will be at least in their 40’s, and most are probably older. Those in their 40’s have already lost about 3.5% of their hearing. Those in their 50’s have lost over 11% of their hearing (on average). (link provided below). I would guess that most of us who enjoy our audio systems probably tend to listen at higher levels than the average Joe with his big-box-store HT system connected to his TV. If anything, we would tend to be on the higher end of the hearing loss curve as a result. I probably lost at least 3% at an Aerosmith concert in 1978.
But I’m not trying to convince anyone here not to spend the money if it’s just burning a hole in your pocket. HiFi salesmen gotta eat, too, and your state could use the sales tax. However, I would strongly recommend people taking Leo’s advice (above) and start with the room analysis and treatments. Put in as much acoustic damping material and as many bass traps as your spouse will let you get away with. I don’t think there’s one soul on this or any respectable audio forum who would argue with the enormous and easily measurable differences room acoustics make. Then and only then would I expect to see a clown car.
https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/hearing-loss-increases-with-age