Does a modern pre-amp sound better than an old one?


I have had a Primare P30 Processor for 17 years, using it control 5 Genelec active monitors and 2 REL subwoofers. It still has nearly all the functionality that I need, except for room correction. Connections are balanced. I am wondering whether it might be worthwhile to upgrade to something more modern, with a budget of around £2,000. Would, for example, the Marantz AV8805 give me a noticeably better sound? Most of it´s other features (13 outs, Atmos etc.) would be redundant. Thanks
garbo
It depends, not always true that new products outperform the old ones.
I heard several vintage stuff, of course, all in perfect electrical conditions, destroy modern audio stuff.
For example, take the AGI 511, it has long been regarded as an unsurpassed preamplifier.
I had one that I foolishly sold, and I can confirm that its Phono section has literally surpassed tons of modern phono amps I had.
Thanks. As the processor includes a DAC, I would like to include the question of whether DAC´s have improved over the last 20 years. If so, should one invest in a modern DAC and place that before the old pre-amp?

I used a Primare SP 30 for years, and thought it would be tough to beat. It finally died, and I bought an Arcam AV 9 preamp-processor (used, for $700), and it sounds better than the SP 30. My Esoteric DV-60 uni-player went TU, and I bought a nice, used Arcam DV 139 uni-player, and it stomped all over what the Esoteric could do.

I would say yes, DACs have improved.
I'd say you should really listen. It has varied a lot over time. My old Theta Casanova spanked a lot of DAC's, and popular modern processors for pure sound quality.

Room correction is useful, but not essential. What it does best is integrate the subwoofer for you, and tweak the center channel which may not be ideally located (like on a shelf).

I really like the Anthem processors.

Best,

E