Does Time alignment and Phase coherency make for a better loudspeaker?

@cindyment People here are pretty cool if you let them know who you are, otherwise, they assume that you MUST be the person they were arguing with earlier who has ten monikers so one can "gang" up on the other. Its all good. Enjoy yourself and walk away from the bitter old retired white guys, certain that you are going to try to convince them get vaccinated or the inverse....who knows these days. LOL. Be well and get the supply chain worked out...someone on here is certain there is a nefarious conspiracy!

Awwwww Bless oldhvyILIKETOSHOUTmec…. Thing is Cobba you are still not sure are you , even now !!! , why else has it taken so long to charge to the rescue?

Oh … Oh…🤣 How painfully needy , bordering on tragic.

Take the last pair of posts by “cindy” , and merely replace the authors monicker with a certain Narcistic and Egotistical individual then read again!

Too egregiously egotistical to even disguise the recidivism in prose , style and content , at least there has taken place a weak yet blatantl attempt at concealment by condensing the usual three paragraphs into one… Tragic 

@cindyment , my program runs sine sweeps from 10 Hz to 20 kHz and reads same. My speakers, Sound Labs 645-8's are "on axis" over a 45 degree arc. Any frequency response variation would be a manifestation of the room. I prefer to be interested in the listening position only. The rest of the room is background music as far as I am concerned. All my comments about frequency response are in regards to the listening position only. I could actually program presets for corrections aimed at various locations in the room but it is a lot of work for locations where the music is purely background. The system was tuned to be flat at the listening position then adjusted to the target curve I like which I mentioned above paying special attention from 100 Hz to 10 kHz keeping both channels within a dB of each other across that band. This was done by making small adjustments and repeated measuring. I would like to get it closer but right now the resolution of the system I am currently using is not good enough. But, I do have my eye on a new one. Like you I am totally into digital signal processing as I do not believe there is any other way to get the job done. There is no other way to do it to be honest but, if you say that here you will get cable elevators launched at your head. I suggest you get yourself a nice set of audiophile fuses to throw back.