I have heard the SC-V's with a 300W/ch stereo amp, 350 watt monoblocks, 600W/ch stereo, and 1000W mono's. The SC-V's sounded great with all of them. Since each amp was progressively higher quality in itself, it would be difficult to attribute the better sound with each increment to the additional power. The additional power did make for wider dynamic range, better dynamic contrast.
I'd be pretty hestitent to drive these speakers with less than 200W/ch if you expect to have any dynamic contrast at realistic listening levels. I also think that the SC-V's can only be used in medium to large rooms, which means you need to consume a certain amount of power just to achieve that base listening level. Then you'd need three times that in reserve for peaks.
These speakers are very efficient, but large. I doubt they would work well in a small room with a small amp. The SC-IVa's, or III's would be better suited to smaller rooms.
I'd be pretty hestitent to drive these speakers with less than 200W/ch if you expect to have any dynamic contrast at realistic listening levels. I also think that the SC-V's can only be used in medium to large rooms, which means you need to consume a certain amount of power just to achieve that base listening level. Then you'd need three times that in reserve for peaks.
These speakers are very efficient, but large. I doubt they would work well in a small room with a small amp. The SC-IVa's, or III's would be better suited to smaller rooms.