Dustcover Blues

@millercarbon , Correct MC, when the gauge is stressed it changes resistance which modulates the supplied voltage which is subtracted afterwards leaving only the signal. Messing with the power supply might not be a good thing. If the voltage subtracted is not exactly equal to the voltage added you will get a dc offset. If your amps go down to DC you could have fried woofer for dinner. If run through a preamp this might filter the DC out.

I do not think it is weak bass but rather exaggerated highs supposedly a hangover from the RIAA curve. Several reviews have noticed this. I can correct for it so it is no worry for me. Weak bass I won't tolerate. If I can't feel the bass drum beat that would kill it for me.

@rauliruegas , you did not make a suggestion for a phono stage or comment on the Lino C. I'll be taking 5 records I know very well down with me. I should be able to pick up any major problem depending on the system Mr Ledermann is using. I won't spend that kind of money if I am not completely comfortable with it. I am also very captivated by the transimpedance approach to amplifying a moving coil cartridge. The only problem is that it limits you to very low impedance cartridges. I have no problem with this as there are many excellent low impedance cartridges. I read uniformly good things about the MySonicLab cartridges then there is Lyra and Ortofon. The new Verismo looks very interesting. The My Sonic Ultra Eminant Ex with an impedance of 0.6 ohms is perfect for a transimpedance stage. 

Dear @mijostyn  : Years ago I listened the SS SG mounted in a Schroeder tonearm and in first rate room/system and there I had the opportunity to compare it against the Lyra Olympos and at least for me no contest against that Olympos set up.

Years ago too in the SS site was a link and the SG real curve and unfortunatelly SS decided to take out/off the site.

" The Italian article did a very good job of explaining to a general audience the difference between "velocity" devices and "displacement" devices.."

In a very hot dialogue where I posted PL him self posted:

" I have measured the SG in many arms, and recently in my Schroder Reference SQ, the new SG design (which you did not hear) it was +/- 1dB from 50 Hz to 12K in conformation with RIAA. ..."

That measure tell us a swing of 2db where our ears are more sensitive but the deviation from the RIAA below 50hz and over 12khz are even higher.

No problem with if what you listen like it.

Now, I understand you owned or listen to the Lino that could be better performer that your today phono stage.

I know very well the overall design of the Lino and other current mode phono stages and for personal reasons I'm not with the kind of overall designs/parts used to build those phono stages.

But that " preference "/captivated you have with and that you ""  exaggerated highs supposedly a hangover from the RIAA curve. Several reviews have noticed this. I can correct for it "" in the digital domain precludes my recomendation to you to really  arrive nearer to the recording and live MUSIC event.

My path/road is totally different from yours.

R.

Because of the way this works it requires no RIAA equalization. One of its many advantages over the conventional approach.

@mijostyn @millercarbon This statement is false. While it is true that the cartridge has an output that seems to complement the RIAA de-emphasis curve, from 500Hz to just above 2KHz (75uS) in the RIAA curve there is a bit where it flattens out. This causes an unequalized strain gauge device to be a little off. So they do need equalization to be correct but not nearly as much as a regular constant velocity device.

Its correct to say that it roughly approximates the needed de-emphasis.

Take a look at the RIAA curves- you'll see a 'zero' at 500Hz (318uS) (where the math says 'flat'- that's why its a 'zero' instead of a pole) and a pole above 2KHz (75uS) which re-introduces the slope. A strain gauge doesn't have that zero so what happens is it has the same slope across the band. This causes the highs to be and sound wrong. Its not glaring but if you know the recording its easy to hear.

RIAA EQ is +20dB at the bottom, -20dB at the top. SG does not require this so the statement is true. 

@atmasphere , Have you heard the cartridge? Theoretically it should out track any other cartridge but his MI cartridges track anything I can throw at them. I can correct frequency response problems but I won't get involved if there are not significant advantages in the design.

@rauliruegas , I have no experience with the Lino C. I have an ARC PH3 SE which I really like for high output cartridges. It is a simple unit with just one switch in the signal path. It is a hybrid tube unit with a FET front end. It really does not have enough gain for cartridges with output < 0.5 mv. It is 30 some odd years old and still in perfect working order but it is time to move up. I do not like complex phono stages. It is too easy to damage the low level signal coming from a LOMC. The Lino C is a minimalist unit which is balanced throughout which I really like. Loading adjustments are not required and it is battery operated, another big advantage. I can use the ARC for high output cartridges which I prefer to MCs with certain music. The other candidate is the Sutherland Phono Loco.