Dynaudio vs B&W help...


Hey everyone... curious on your thoughts between a set of Dynaudio Focus 600XD vs B&W 804D2 speakers. The Dynaudio are obviously amplified, the 804's would be run off my Cambridge CXR200 (170 wpc). 

Over all, which would be a better set up for music and HT fronts? Thanks!
manofsteelpt
Post removed 
I wonder,you will drive the B&W with existing amp but are looking at powered Dynaudio's..Why not look at the passive Dynaudio's same as B&W?
Freedriver, a few reasons: I guess I just presumed the 804's would be a better speaker than a passive Dynaudio. Size, I didn't want an overly large tower. Both were available and about the same price. 

I love over the look of the 804's, and I guess I would prefer them. But, if my CXR wouldn't sufficiently run them, I'd throw the 600 XD in the mix. Then, the AVR would just just run my center and process everything. 

Another option is a Focal 1028 BE 2... ugh, so many options!!! 
I’ve owned the 804D2’s for about 3 years.  I ran them for HT and 2-channel listening, prior to building a separate HT passthru, dedicated 2-channel setup.  They are more efficient than many  Dynaudio’s, but it was not until I put the 804’s on a McIntosh MC452 that they really opened up.  I ran them with a couple different McIntosh integrated’s, prior to the MC452, and also ran them on a B&K 200.7 when I used them in my HT.  Frankly, for my personal listening tastes, I was never a fan.  For HT they were fine, but that seemed a waste to me, at the time $7500 for HT R/L.  I viewed them as an ex-girlfriend I really wanted to like, but just continually disrespected me and was happy to see them go.  

I now run Dynaudio Confidence C4’s, not quite an apples to apples comparison, but I lean towards the Dyn sound, it’s just my preference.  Ultimately, it is your money and listening preferences that drive your decision, I would throw caution to the wind and that my experience with the 802’s was that 200w was not enough power to drive them properly.  

@toddcowles - The B&W D2 is going to be a slightly warm/soft response in the midrange because of the Kevlar.  The B&K 200.7 is an great amp with high current, but it is extremely warm sounding (I had this exact amp in the past).  I can totally see where the combination of these two items would sound very lackluster.  The McIntosh would probably do better, but still the McIntosh is not a very fast amplifier - McIntosh will lean toward a full and warm midrange (but probably not as extreme as B&K).  The D2 series would do much better with amps such as Krell, Classe (new stuff), or Bryston or Plinius.

The B&W D2 series really needs a high current amp with very fast resolution.  The Cambridge CXR 200 should be just fine as the Cambridge has a faster and more dynamic sonic signature.