Dynavector cartridges, old and new

I agree with Lew 's post from 06-30-20018 stating that ''exotic''

parts do not guarantee ''Nirvana''. But I will try to first make

our ''implicit'' conceptual presuppositions clear and than elaborate.

The first is the simple sentence form ''S is P''. The basic form

to ascribe properties to objects. The other is ''parts and wholes''

pre- conceptions. I think that we all can agree that without

comparison between cartridges we can't make any judgments.

However comparisons are relational  in logical sense while

''S is P'' sentence form is not suitable for relational descriptions.

Say ''brother'' is not some kind of property of an person but a

relation to some other person.

We can see that ''our'' chakster try to explain differences between

carts by their ''parts''. Say in the sense of Lew's ''exotic parts''.

He is very fond of ''diamond cantilevers'' which should be ''as

short as possible'' (grin) This is not my reproach but he admitted

to have an ''border line'' regarding cart prices. I don't believe

that prices have necessary relation to sound quality but what

we call ''the top kind '' are usually pretty expensive .Anyway

chakster limited himself in the sense of ''extension of his

comparisons''.  This limitation is , say, ''financial'' which is in my

case ,say, of less importance. So I was able to buy Allaerts

MC2 which provide pretty strong arguments against ''exotic

parts'' reasoning. There is nothing special by this cart in the

sense of ''parts''. The cart is conventional even old fashioned.

But look at its technical specs and you will not believe your

own eye. There is no other cart that can come close.