Evolution Acoustics MMMicroOne

robsker...great point and one that i hope the people who have ordered them have thought about...i hope they won't be unhappy with them played through systems not as expensive as the ones used to drive them at the shows...

With all due respect to Robsker & Calloway, if the MMMicroOne's were mediocre, great electronics would not make them sound great.

When we voiced the loudspeakers we used all types of amplifiers including an $800 Rotel and they always sounded special to us. We feel this is absolutely a reference level product regardless of the price. I am sure that there are people that will use $300 amps all the way up to mega expensive amplifiers with our loudspeakers.

I will also share with you that there were many people who came to me and said they that thought our MMMicroOne's sounded better than some $30k monitors that were at the show.

Also there were quite a few show reports that gave us "Best Sound at Show" with our MMMicroOnes. Price does not always reflect the quality of a product.

Jonathan Tinn
Evolution Acoustics

I see your point JT, if you cannot trust a reviewer, who can you trust. :-)

Robsker, Calloway,

I agree with Jonathan. Another way of saying it is that since the speaker is downstream of the electronics, if the setup with excellent upstream electronics sounds exceptional then that is testament to the transparency of the speaker just as much as the electronics themselves.

Therefore, one would expect that the same speaker with lesser electronics will mirror the sound of the electronics and not sound as good as with the better electronics, BUT that is not the fault of the speaker. In fact it is its strength. Also, I believe that the transparent speaker with lesser electrronics will still sound better than a less transparent speaker with those lesser electronics. The reason is that you will still hear the micro/macro dynamics, speed and transpareny of the speaker even though the electronics may be of a lower grsade.

Moreover, in my experience, most decent low-priced electronics are much better than you think. I believe, through experience, that speaker quality is much more critical than the the quality of the electronics.

At the end of the day, you want a speaker that sounds great with high priced electronics irrespective of the fact that you may use lower-priced electronics. My two cents.

Andrew

JTINN:

I in no way intimated that the speakers were mediocre. I said that I do not doubt that they are fine speakers. That said...

while it is true that a fine speaker will show forth the quality of the electronics feeding the speakers and that it is impressive that the system with 2K speakers and 80K of electronics sounds great... people need to realize that they are hearing an 82K system. Aoliviero states that speakers are far more important than the quality of electronics. Well... yes. But when ludicrous extremes are used, like 80k of signal to feed 2k speakers to endeavor to sell the 2k speakers... that is almost unethical.

JTinn... If you really thought your speakers were so great (and again, they may be) and that they sound great when driven by lesser electronics (as you state in your post) then by all means audition your speakers at shows with 8K of electronics, not 80K. Give a realistic audition to potential buyers. Certainly you should not fear such an audition.

Last salvo. I have not heard your speakers... but give me an 82K system... say with 50K speakers and 30K of electronics... I guarantee that the system will smoke the system with 2K speakers. That is, after all a very fair comparison --- same priced systems.

The point? It is crazy to push your speakers driven as they were at the show.