I would agree...most cheaper "ports" are simply a hole to increase bass response and to some extent sensitivity/efficiency...that being said...the best "ported" designs take into account phase cancellation,distortion,etc to obtain accurate bass reproduction(ie no boom-box bass)...unfortunately this comes with a high labor/design cost...usually at the 1k level...the new Quad Ls I own have two distinct "chambers" each with their own port...and Im sure damping,etc comes into play...the bottom line: placed away from walls...they produce clean,deep,tight bass...and I am not of fan ports to begin with...but when executed properly...they can sound amazing...and even at high volume there is no audible "chuffing"....once again...it comes down to performance vs. on paper design tendencies...I have heard many highly touted sealed enclosure designs that couldnt compete (ie no bass)....
Front port vs. Rear Port
I have a small apartment, and unfortunately, there's no way I can place speakers a "proper" distance from the wall. I'm looking for monitors, and notice that some, like the Sonus Fabers, are front-ported. I'm wondering if in my situation, it might be better to use a front-ported speaker to avoid bass boominess from placing speakers too close to the wall.
I've never been strong on physics, so I'd appreciate any help.
Thanks in advance.
I've never been strong on physics, so I'd appreciate any help.
Thanks in advance.
- ...
- 8 posts total
- 8 posts total