Genesis Time Lens improvement?

The differences in cables still existed at least from the lens to the D/A. I never experimented enough to know about the transport to the lens.

Thanks for the input. BTW, I'm using a Krell MD1
and SBP64X, both first generation digital products
(from Krell).

The comment about the hum concerns me a little. I
remember having an old Carver receiver when I first
started getting involved in audio; the hum was so loud
(even with a piece of carpeting underneath you could
easily hear it across the room) that I ended up giving
it to my dad. Great excuse for upgrading, though... ;-)

One last question; did any of you find any differences
with cables once the lens was in use?

From what I remember many of the Lens had a rather loud hum to them.

I own a 37 and 36 Levinson. The Digital Lens made a significant improvement. Not huge, but worth the $ on the current used market. I also have noticed a very substantial difference between cables (mind you I didn't say improvement, but difference). I've found the AQ falcon to perform the best for my tastes and the Cardas lightening second and the Orchid was a distant third--but I think it is very system dependent. As for the lens--well it's probably much better than just about any reclocking device and with Genesis out of business the price should be very right (or don't get it at all)

I guess it all depends on how old your Krell D/A is. Older D/A's had little or no jitter filtering or reclocking. My old Forsell D/A (vintage 1994) did not have such filtering; the addition of the Genesis made a dramatic improvement. However, my guess is that if you're dealing with modern gear, the addition of the Genesis is probably superfluous.